Volume 5, Issue 2, December 2019, Page: 43-51
Warehouse Selection Problem Solution by Using Proper MCDM Process
Md. Al Amin, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET), Khulna, Bangladesh
Apurba Das, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET), Khulna, Bangladesh
Sumit Roy, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET), Khulna, Bangladesh
Md. Imran Shikdar, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET), Khulna, Bangladesh
Received: Oct. 3, 2019;       Accepted: Oct. 31, 2019;       Published: Dec. 2, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20190502.13      View  68      Downloads  11
The most efficient warehousing selection has become one of the significant logistics activities. The main objective of this paper is to select the efficient warehouse by using proper MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) process against some specified criteria. This paper exhumes to explore the possibility of using several multi criteria decision making processes in warehouse location problem. This survey work introduces MCDM process in many domains to pick the best alternative from where different scope, weight for many criteria are explored. Among various methods, it is found that, by the means of the AHP and TOPSIS method, the evaluation criteria with references to the concerned goal and characteristics with respect to analogous criteria. A case study has been performed by selected MCDM (AHP, TOPSIS) process for analysing collected data. Before going for the calculation this research has done a survey by asking some question to concerned person regarding warehouse selection. From case study, among five warehouses it is found that the first warehouse is suitable which accomplishes all criteria. A validation test for AHP has been performed to verify the result obtained which also supports the result. Finally, this research paper will help to select efficient warehouse and will improve the logistics system.
MCDM Process, AHP, TOPSIS, Warehouse Selection
To cite this article
Md. Al Amin, Apurba Das, Sumit Roy, Md. Imran Shikdar, Warehouse Selection Problem Solution by Using Proper MCDM Process, International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, pp. 43-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20190502.13
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T. M., & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1 (1), 31-43.
Özcan, T., Çelebi, N. and Esnaf, Ş., 2011. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (8), pp. 9773-9779.
Chen, C. (2009). A decision model of field depot location based on the centrobaric method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Business and Management, 4 (7), 71-75.
Akalin, M., Turhan, G., & Sahin, A. (2013). The Application of AHP Approach for Evaluating Location Selection Elements for Retail Store. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 2 (4), 01-20.
Uma Devi, K., Elango, C. and Rajesh, R., 2012. Vendor selection using AHP. Procedia engineering, 38, pp. 1946-1949.
Velasquez, M. and Hester, P. T., 2013. An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10 (2), pp. 56-66.
Dobrota, M., Macura, D., & Šelmić, M. (2015, May). Multi criteria decision making for distribution center location selection-Serbia case study. In 2nd Logistics International Conference (pp. 32-37).
Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kılınç, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (4), 8143-8151.
Senthil, S., Srirangacharyulu, B. and Ramesh, A., 2014. A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 41 (1), pp. 50-58.
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with applications, 39 (17), 13051-13069.
Colson, G., & Dorigo, F. (2004). A public warehouses selection support system. European Journal of Operational Research, 153 (2), 332-349.
Dervitsiotis, K. N., 1981. Operations management. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Erkan, T. E., & Can, G. F. (2014). Selecting the best warehouse data collecting system by using AHP and FAHP methods. Technical Gazette, 21 (1), 87-93.
MacCarthy, B. L., & Atthirawong, W. (2003). Factors affecting location decisions in international operations–a Delphi study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23 (7), 794-818.
Emeç, Ş., & Akkaya, G. (2018). Stochastic AHP and fuzzy VIKOR approach for warehouse location selection problem. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31 (6), 950-962.
Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. K. (2016). Warehouse location selection by fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodologies based on subjective and objective criteria. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 11 (4), 262-278.
Boltürk, E., Çevik Onar, S., Öztayşi, B., Kahraman, C., & Goztepe, K. (2016). Multi-attribute warehouse location selection in humanitarian logistics using hesitant fuzzy AHP. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 8, 271-298.
Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B. E., Gardas, B. B., & Raut, V. (2017). Multi-criteria decision making approach: a sustainable warehouse location selection problem. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 10 (3), 260-281.
Browse journals by subject