Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2018, Page: 108-117
Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015
Li Mingjie, Department of Thermal and Power Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
Hua Mingcun, Department of Thermal and Power Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
Received: Aug. 22, 2018;       Accepted: Sep. 19, 2018;       Published: Oct. 8, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17      View  198      Downloads  5
Abstract
Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.
Keywords
Chaser, Detection, Universal Tool Maker's Microscope
To cite this article
Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun, Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015, International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis. Vol. 4, No. 3, 2018, pp. 108-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Hu Min, Cheng Fei Yue. Several methods for evaluating straightness error [J]. Modern measurement and laboratory management, 2006, 5: 26-27.
[2]
Chen Shanyuan, Shen Biao, Zhu Qiang. The causes of burning, loosening and breaking of graphite electrode-joint connection and their solutions were discussed from the point of view of mechanical processing [J]. Carbon technology, 2002(6):44-46.
[3]
Suo Yuanping, Cui Zhenhua. Analysis of the factors influencing the quality of graphite electrode and joint processing [J]. Carbon technology, 2005(2): 43-45.
[4]
Cai Anjiang, design of thread chaser, [J]. tool technology, 1998, (32).
[5]
Zhu Wangquan. Special comb cutter design [J]. solution, 2010, (8).
[6]
Song Bing, Wang Longmei. Parametric Application of Thread Card Processing Procedure [J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2010 (6).
[7]
Chen Dehong, Hu Rongsheng, Yin Guomao. Research and application of casing thread comb [J]. Cemented carbide, 1999 (1): 29-33.
[8]
Lin Chengsen, numerical method. Beijing: Science Press, 1998. P83, 84.
[9]
Hou Xuezhi, digital image cutter measuring machine, 2004. 02. P2, 8, 9.
[10]
Tong Fangsen, carbon materials production Q & a [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1991.
[11]
Tang Zongjun, foundation of mechanical manufacturing [M]. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press.
Browse journals by subject